Act 3 · Special relativity

E = mc²

A three-page afterthought to the relativity paper, which turned out to say where the Sun gets its light and what most of your mass actually is.

1905 – 193216 min
By the end you should be able to
  • Explain what is genuinely new in E = mc² — that a body at rest already has energy
  • Say why nothing with mass can reach the speed of light, in terms of energy rather than rules
  • Describe the experiment that first checked the equation, and what it measured

Three months after the relativity paper, Einstein sent the same journal a follow-up of about three pages. It contains no experiment, no apparatus and barely any mathematics, and its title is a question: "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?" The answer is yes, and the paper is the shortest famous document in physics.

The argument fits in a paragraph. Take a body at rest and let it emit two flashes of light in exactly opposite directions, so that momentum balances and the body stays put. Now describe the same event from a frame gliding past. The Doppler shift changes the energies of the two flashes unequally, and insisting that energy is conserved in both accounts forces a conclusion: the body’s mass has decreased, by the energy it radiated divided by c².

The mass of a body is a measure of its energy content; if the energy changes by L, the mass changes in the same sense by L/9 × 10²⁰… It is not impossible that with bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g. with radium salts) the theory may be successfully put to the test.

Albert EinsteinDoes the Inertia of a Body Depend upon its Energy Content?, September 1905

The amount is absurd. c² is 9 × 10¹⁶ in metres and seconds, so one gram of anything at all carries about 90 terajoules — in the region of a couple of kilotons of TNT. There is nothing exotic about the material; the energy is in your coffee cup and your desk. It is simply extraordinarily hard to get at, because almost nothing releases more than a whisper of it.

You might think

In a nuclear reaction, matter is converted into energy — one substance becomes another.

Actually

Nothing is transmuted. Mass is a form of energy: the energy a system has when it is not going anywhere. In a nuclear reaction the products have less rest mass than the reactants, and the difference appears as kinetic energy of the fragments. Weigh the whole sealed system afterwards, including all the heat and light, and the total is unchanged. The books simply balance in a currency nobody had noticed.

Why nothing reaches c

Pour energy into a particle and watch two markers: what relativity says, and what Newton’s ½mv² says. Slide from the bottom of the range to the top, and try the LHC proton button.

Loading the accelerator…
Newton’s marker walks off the end of the track once the kinetic energy passes ½mc². Relativity’s stops just short of c and creeps, while the energy bar keeps growing — the energy is going into γ, not into speed.

Twenty-seven years later

Einstein had no way to test any of it, and said so in the paper — suggesting that radium salts might one day allow a check. The check came in 1932, from two men in Cambridge building the first machine deliberately designed to smash a nucleus apart.

Portrait photograph of John Cockcroft in a suit.
John Cockcroft1897–1967

Nobel foundation, 1951. Public domain

Portrait photograph of Ernest Walton in a suit.
Ernest Walton1903–1995

Nobel foundation, 1951. Public domain

A tall cascade voltage-multiplier accelerator, a stack of large capacitors and rectifiers.
A cascade generatorthe voltage multiplier they invented

The wub, 2024-01-05 17:02:10. CC BY-SA 4.0

The voltage multiplier they built to reach several hundred kilovolts is still called a Cockcroft–Walton generator, and the design was used to inject particles into accelerators for the next seventy years. They shared the 1951 Nobel Prize.
The experiment

Splitting lithium

John Cockcroft and Ernest Walton · April 1932 · Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge

The question
If a nucleus is broken apart, does the energy released match the mass that goes missing, at exactly c² per kilogram?
The apparatus
A voltage multiplier of their own design producing several hundred kilovolts, accelerating protons down an evacuated tube onto a lithium target. The products were detected as scintillations on a zinc sulphide screen, watched by eye in a darkened hut, with the observer’s eyes dark-adapted for half an hour first.
Theory predicted

From the known atomic masses, ⁷Li + ¹H → 2 ⁴He should lose about 0.0186 atomic mass units. Multiplied by c², that is about 17.3 MeV, and the two alpha particles should share it — roughly 8.6 MeV each, flying apart back to back.

They measured

Scintillations in coincidence on opposite sides of the target, from alpha particles of about 8.6 MeV each. The energy released matched the missing mass to within the precision of the mass measurements available.

How sure could they be? Limited mainly by how well the atomic masses were then known, a few parts in a thousand. Later repetitions have confirmed the relation to better than one part in a million; a 2005 measurement using nuclear binding energies and Penning traps tested it to about four parts in ten million.

Why it mattered

The first direct experimental confirmation of E = mc², and an unusually clean one: a weighing on one side, a measurement of motion on the other, and c² in between. It was also the first nuclear disintegration produced by artificially accelerated particles — the beginning of accelerator physics.

Where it shows up

The consequence everybody knows is the Sun. Around 600 million tonnes of hydrogen fuse into helium every second, and the helium is about four million tonnes lighter. Those four million tonnes, times c², are the sunlight — including the fraction that reaches your skin. The Sun has been running this way for four and a half billion years and has consumed roughly a hundredth of one per cent of itself.

  1. 1905Einstein, September: three pages, and the suggestion that radium might test it.
  2. 1907He generalises the argument and starts calling rest energy a property of all matter.
  3. 1932Cockcroft and Walton split lithium and check the sum.
  4. 1938Bethe works out the fusion cycles that power the Sun.
  5. 1945The equation acquires a reputation it has never lost, for a weapon Einstein did not build and later regretted encouraging.
  6. 2005A direct test using Penning-trap mass measurements confirms it to four parts in 10⁷.